|
Available Now |
 |
|
Organ music from Holy Trinity Cathedral,
played by
Eugene Lavery,
Assistant Organist |
|
Click here |
|
Religion, Science and Creation
The Rt Rev’d Richard Randerson, Dean
1 January 2006
Just before Christmas an American judge ruled that the theory of intelligent
design (such as a Creator God) of Creation is based on a supernatural explanation
for natural phenomena, and cannot be taught as part of a high school science
curriculum. The ruling is part of a perennial debate as to whether the biblical
account of Creation in Genesis 1 is science, or something else.
Those who look to Genesis 1 for a scientific account on Creation point to the
evolutionary nature of that account. From a formless void there emerges sequentially
over six “days” light and darkness, the heavens, land and sea, vegetation,
sun, moon and stars, living creatures and finally human beings. This is not
strictly in line with the scientific order of evolution, but is evolutionary
in concept. The parallel with science is striking, yet the biblical story-tellers
of 3,500 years could not have a knowledge of science equal to our own. Nor was
science their intention in crafting the Creation story.
Taking another approach, Archbishop James Ussher of Armagh, a theologian of
note in the 17th century, calculated from an historical perspective that the
world was created in 4004BC. Some old bibles have this and subsequent dates
appended in the notes. It is unlikely that the Archbishop, armed with today’s
knowledge, would make such a calculation.
Others argue that the Bible must be right in postulating God as Creator, for
how else could one explain some of the many unanswered questions we have about
the beginnings of the universe. The problem with this “God of the gaps”
argument is that as science advances and more answers are found, the dependence
on God as the stop-gap solution diminishes.
These and other such arguments that seek to prove that the writers of Genesis
provide us with a scientific or historical account of Creation make a fundamental
category mistake. They miss the real purpose of the Creation story which is
not history or science, but theology. The story conveys the Hebrew understanding
of God’s relationship with the created order, and with humankind. It provides
us with a world-view as to how we should live in relationship to God, other
people, and Earth itself.
All cultures have their stories about the origins of life. Maori have the story
of Rangi-nui, the sky father, and Papatuanuku, the earth mother. The Maori story
is no more science or history than is the biblical story of Genesis 1. But both
have similar themes in the sacredness of nature, and the consequent reverence
we should have for people, all life forms and Earth itself.
The Judaeo-Christian story of Creation from Genesis 1 tells us several key
things :
- The whole of Creation is alive with the active and life-giving presence
of God (Genesis 1.2: “The Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters”).
- The Earth is God’s gift to us, and it is good (Gen 1.31: “God
saw everything he had made, and it was very good”).
- We live in relationship with Creation, respecting each person and part as
created by God. It is from this concept of relationship that all our efforts
for justice, peace and environmental conservation stem : this is not merely
a matter of ethics, but an expression of our deep relational connection with
all life.
- At the heart of our being is our core relationship with God : it is because
we see God as the source of all life that we regard all life as sacred and worthy
of respect (“When we see God as our father and mother, we see every other
person and part as our brother and sister”).
- Having God at the centre of life prevents us from acting selfishly and exploitatively
towards others or to the Earth itself.
Science is science, and theology is theology: they are not competing truths,
but complementary. Science tells us how the world was made. Theology gives us
a world-view which tells us how we should understand the world, and how we should
live within it.
On January 1 we celebrate the feast of the circumcision of Jesus, more often
known today as the naming of Jesus. It is a day of dedication, the 8th day following
a birth according to Jewish custom. The name “Jesus” means salvation
– a Latin word meaning wholeness in every aspect of life, wholeness because
as Jesus was dedicated to God, so we too dedicate our lives afresh to God for
the year that lies ahead.
Our reflections about Creation are very relevant to a feast of dedication.
The story of Creation provides us with this picture of a life-giving and divine
spirit at the heart of all life. It instils within us a profound sense of the
gift and the goodness of God in Creation and calls forth from us a song of praise
and celebration. In affirming the integrity and God-given nature of all people,
other species on Earth, and the Earth itself, it calls us to a life characterised
by love and compassion for all living things, and leads us into ministries of
justice, peace and caring for the environment.
And by having God at the centre of our life, we are not only sustained personally
by the divine love and power, but we are prevented from the self-seeking that
leads to power over others and abuse of the Earth’s resources.
|